'Hoo-Boy': Trump's Judicial Nominee Shows No Knowledge of Basic Legal Terms in Hearing
The testimony of one of President Donald Trump’s latest judicial nominees went viral Thursday after the potential future U.S. District Court judge was shown to have no knowledge of basic legal terms and little experience in law.
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) asked Federal Election Commissioner Matthew Spencer Petersen if he had ever tried a criminal or civil case or a case in a state or federal court, finally questioning whether he had even taken a deposition without supervision from a more senior attorney—the answers to all of which were “no.”
Petersen also appeared to be unfamiliar with legal rules dictating court procedures and several examples of legal terminology.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) posted about Petersen’s testimony on Twitter, expressing shock at his flimsy qualifications for an appointment as a federal judge.
But Petersen is only the latest of Trump’s judicial nominees to draw attention for their lack of eligibility. Earlier this week, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) urged the Trump administration to withdraw its nominations of Brett Talley and Jeff Mateer, nominated to district courts in Alabama and Texas, respectively.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT